- Loading...
- No images or files uploaded yet.
|
|
06-30-2003Page history last edited by 1 yr ago
June 30, 2003ROMNEY SIGNS NO NEW TAX BUDGET IN TIME FOR NEW FISCAL YEARSays reforms are a good start, but will continue to fight for more
Governor Mitt Romney today signed into law a $22.1 billion budget for Fiscal Year 2004 that closes a nearly $3 billion gap and does not raise taxes on the people of Massachusetts.
He also announced that he expects the current Fiscal Year 2003, which ends today, to be “in the black,” a major turnaround from the $650 million deficit he inherited upon taking office.
Romney vetoed just over $200 million from the spending plan to meet his constitutional requirement to balance the budget. The budget proposes to spend $300 million less than the $22.4 billion that is projected to be spent in the current fiscal year.
He applauded the Legislature for completing the budget in a timely manner so that he could sign it before the start of the new fiscal year, noting that this is the first budget in seven years and only the fourth in 21 years to be finished on time.
“We have successfully closed the largest deficit in our state’s history without raising taxes,” Romney said. “Not many states can make that claim, but here in Massachusetts we can be proud of what we have accomplished on behalf of our citizens. I am grateful to the Legislature for their efforts.”
He added, “With this budget, we’ve launched the state on the road to reform. We didn’t get everything we wanted, but we got a lot. And as Arnold Schwarzenegger might say, ‘I’ll be back.’”
The Fiscal Year 2004 spending plan embraces many of the ideas Romney proposed earlier this year, including:
Romney said the reforms in the budget represent a solid start, but ticked off a number of items on his agenda that remain unfinished, such as workforce changes and major reforms to transportation, education and the courts.
“Change doesn’t happen overnight or in six months,” Romney said. “Reform is a four year job and we’ll be fighting for it every step of the way.”
Lieutenant Governor Kerry Healey agreed, saying, “The people of Massachusetts can take pride in the progress that has been made so far. We are putting our state’s finances in order and setting the Commonwealth on a long-term road of fiscal stability and economic prosperity.”
She added, “Governor Romney and I look forward to working hard to continue the momentum for change in the months ahead. Together, we will give our Commonwealth a state government that is as efficient, honest and hard-working as the people of Massachusetts deserve.”
Because of faulty revenue assumptions and because the Legislature did not adopt all of his reform proposals, Romney vetoed $201 million in spending, the largest of which was a $23 million reduction in the Additional Assistance category of local aid. He also rejected several items in the budget, saying they take the state in the wrong direction.
Specific vetoes include language that would have:
“This year’s budget represents just the first step,” Romney said. “We still have financial challenges ahead of us, but with ingenuity and hard work, we can solve them.”
He added, “We will continue to push for our plans to merge the Turnpike Authority, adopt court reform and institute workforce changes that will give us the tools to manage effectively. Our energy is limitless.”
In the budget Romney signed, the Prescription Advantage program is preserved and MassHealth Basic coverage to 36,000 individuals who lost it earlier this year is restored.
Saying he is not in favor of taxpayer funds being used for political campaigns, Romney also allowed to stand a repeal of the Clean Elections system. During the campaign, he proposed a way to shift the burden off of the taxpayers and onto the politicians themselves. Under his plan, political candidates who do not abide by the spending and fundraising limits would transfer 10 percent of their receipts in order to subsidize qualified candidates who abide by the limits.
Romney endorsed the changes to the Quinn Bill, but filed an amendment to ask for two exemptions. He proposed grandfathering in law enforcement officials who have served 30 or more consecutive days in active military duty since the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001 or who have more than half of the credits necessary to earn a degree.
“I support the changes to the Quinn Bill,” Romney said. “The exceptions I have proposed are fair to our police officers who have either served their country or are more than halfway through their course of study.”
In addition, Romney returned with an amendment a budget provision requiring the Health and Human Services Secretary to develop a coordinated prescription drug procurement program. The amendment requires the state move forward with coordinated purchasing, but makes key changes to make sure it is implemented more effectively. It institutes a competitive bid process to select a qualified pharmacy benefits management company, extends the implementation time from six months to one year and allows the Executive Office of Health and Human Services to have more discretion over the program guidelines.
Romney also fulfilled a commitment to provide signing bonuses to teachers by filing an amendment to the budget that will provide $4 million in already pledged bonuses to educators. To the Honorable Senate and House of Representatives:06-30-2003
Pursuant to the provisions of Section 5 of Article 63 of the Amendments to the Constitution, I am today signing House 4004, An Act Making Appropriations for the Fiscal Year 2004 for the Maintenance of the Departments, Boards, Commissions, Institutions and Certain Activities of the Commonwealth, for Interest, Sinking Fund and Serial Bond Requirements and for Certain Permanent Improvements.
I commend you for completing this budget in a timely manner without raising taxes and without using our dwindling Stabilization Fund reserves. However, because I believe that available revenues will not be enough to support the level of expenditures you have recommended, I am vetoing $201 million to ensure that the Fiscal Year 2004 budget is balanced and that we maintain a more sustainable level of government spending. I am also vetoing many other sections of this bill, including provisions that would have moved the Commonwealth's pension funding off budget. I am filing today legislation to account for this spending in the appropriate way.
It is encouraging to see that you adopted a number of the reform provisions that I put forth in my House 1 budget recommendation and Article 87 Reform, Restructure, and Revitalize legislation. Among my proposed reforms, I am pleased to be signing today legislation that:
It is also encouraging that, after working with my Secretary of Health and Human Services, you have adopted our plan to restore 36,000 members to the MassHealth Basic program, as well as much-needed preliminary reforms in the Uncompensated Care Pool.
Your enactment of two other proposals is an important step in our continued efforts to maintain a positive business environment and improve access to affordable housing. Extending the Investment Tax Credit for five years to 2009 will help revive our economy, and investing $70 million in capital funds through the Affordable Housing Trust will help meet the state's critical need for reasonably priced housing.
While I did not propose it, I am also signing the repeal of taxpayer-funded elections. Although I am supportive of campaign finance reform, I do not believe that taxpayer money should be used for that purpose. That view is also consistent with the recent referendum vote.
We have taken significant steps in this budget to put the state budget back on track, but we need to work on more extensive changes, especially in the areas of workforce reforms and Executive Branch management authority, to ensure that it stays on a sustainable course for the future. My vetoes today reflect the need to hold the line on state spending and manage the Commonwealth effectively and efficiently. Therefore:
I hereby approve the remainder of this Act.'
Respectfully submitted,
Mitt Romney's signature Mitt Romney Governor
http://www.mass.gov/eoaf/gov_veto_docs.htm
|
Comments (0)
You don't have permission to comment on this page.