🔍 Discovery and Sorting
Users can explore media by combining filters across all dimensions.
Example Queries
| Goal | Example Query |
|---|
| Learn from best evidence | "Show high-truth, high-depth media about climate change." |
| Understand opposition | "Show high-impact media opposing gun control, sorted by truth score, so I can understand the strongest version." |
| Cultural influence research | "Which media most influenced the belief that 'corporate regulation hurts the economy'? Show pro and con." |
| Personal discovery | "Find profound, irreverent comedy about social justice with high originality scores." |
| Historical analysis | "What media shaped views on nuclear energy over time? Track external linkage scores 1950-present." |
| Educational content | "Find high-truth media supporting environmental protection with hopeful or comedic tone." |
| Misinformation tracking | "Show highest-impact, lowest-truth media on [topic] to understand misinformation spread." |
Sorting Options
For any belief, users can sort media by:
- Impact/Reach (most viewed/read/influential)
- Truth Score (most accurate)
- Quality Score (best crafted)
- External Linkage (most influential on this belief)
- Internal Linkage (most central themes)
- Genre/Style match (best fit for preferences)
- Pro vs. Con (supporting or opposing the belief)
- Recency (newest or most historically significant)
- Epistemic Impact (Truth × Reach)
This turns culture into a searchable map of collective reasoning — where every work has traceable epistemic weight.
Related: One Page Per Topic for organizing beliefs | Deliberative Democracy for structured exploration
📊 Summary Table
| Category | Definition | Example | Range |
|---|
| Media Quality Score | Originality + Depth + Truth | Silent Spring = 0.92 | -1.0 → +1.0 |
| Media Truth Score | Accuracy of central claims | Silent Spring = 0.92 | -1.0 → +1.0 |
| Impact / Reach | Audience size & cultural presence | 5M views, bestseller | 0 → ∞ |
| Internal Linkage | Centrality to the work itself | "Freedom vs. control" = 0.95 | 0 → 1.0 |
| External Linkage | Influence on public belief | Cuckoo's Nest = 0.85 | 0 → 1.0 |
| Genre / Style Scores | Tone and emotional profile | Funny = 0.85, Profound = 0.60 | 0 → 1.0 |
| Epistemic Impact | Truth × Influence | High-truth + high-reach = maximum benefit | -∞ → +∞ |
Comments (0)
You don't have permission to comment on this page.