If you are citizen of an European Union member nation, you may not use this service unless you are at least 16 years old.
You already know Dokkio is an AI-powered assistant to organize & manage your digital files & messages. Very soon, Dokkio will support Outlook as well as One Drive. Check it out today!
Press Releases, Quotes, Speeches, and Videos from Mitt Romney about Charter Schools Policy: organized by year
Governor Mitt Romney "Charter School" Quotes
“Charter schools are important centers for innovation, achievement and accountability in education. It is especially important for parents with children in low-performing districts to have an alternative, and I will continue to fight any measure that would restrict this choice or the addition of new charters.”
“Charter schools embrace innovative educational practices that encourage competition and hold teachers and administratorsaccountable for the academic achievement of their students. Choice within the Massachusetts public school system should be available to all parents, particularly those with children in our low-performing districts.”
Mitt Romney has said: “The defeat of this radical and violent faction of Islam must be achieved through a combination of American resolve, international effort, and the rejection of violence by moderate, modern, mainstream Muslims. An effective strategy will involve both military and diplomatic actions to support modern Muslim nations. America must help lead a broad-based international coalition that promotes secular education, modern financial and economic policies, international trade, and human rights.”
Lets contrast that with Hillary Clinton. Hillary believes that America can not preach secular education in the Muslim world and promote vouchers at home. Here is the video:
First parent who comes says, ‘I want to send my daughter to St. Peter’s Roman Catholic School’ and you say ‘Great, wonderful school, here’s your voucher.’
Next parent who comes says, ‘I want to send you know my child to the Jewish Day-school’. ‘Great here’s your voucher.’
Next parent says, ‘I want to send my child to the private school that I have always dreamed of sending my child to’. ‘Fine here’s your voucher.’
Next parent says, ‘I want to send my child to I want to send my child to the school of the Church of the White Supremacist.’ You say, ‘wait a minute. You can’t send, we are not giving you a voucher for that.’ And the parent says, ‘Well the way that I read Genesis, Cain was marked, therefore I believe in white supremacy. And therefore you gave it to a Catholic parent, you gave it to a Jewish parent, you gave it to a secular private school parent, under the Constitution, you can’t discriminate against me.’
Suppose the next parent comes and says, ‘I want to send my child to the school of jihad.’ ‘Wait a minute. We are not going to send a child with tax payers dollars to the school of Jihad.’ ‘Well you gave it to a Catholics, you gave it to a Jews, you gave it to the private secular people. You going to tell me I can’t. I’m a tax payer. Under the constitution.’
Now tell me how we are going to make those choices.
It’s not difficult. All you need is Common Sense.
Speaking of Common Sense, Philip K. Howard wrote a book called, The Death of Common Sense: How Law is Suffocating America. This book outlines how New York City laws forbidding Mother Theresa from opening a two-story homeless shelter unless she installs an elevator. The project was scraped.
According to Hillary Clinton you can’t have vouchers because people could teach bad things with those vouchers. Using that same logic, we shouldn’t have ropes, because people could do bad things with them.
The media acts like democrats are sophisticated, just because they seek to be counterintuitive. Just because you are counterintuitive does not mean you are smart.
3rd graders understand the stupidity the idea that “you can’t have vouchers because people could teach bad things with those vouchers.” But these are the kind of unsophisticated, stupid things that democrats believe, when even a 3rd grader can find the solution: DON”T GIVE VOUCHERS TO THOSE WHO PREACH HATE! But that would force someone to make a value judgments, and democrats have to tell themselves that they are better that republicans, because they don’t impose their values on others. And so they can’t “judge” jihadist schools or white supremacist schools are bad, they have to outlaw all vouchers!
Do you agree with Mitt Romney that “America must help lead a broad-based international coalition that promotes secular education, modern financial and economic policies, international trade, and human rights.”
Do you think that American tax payer funded schools should promote a secular education in the Islamic world? In America? Do you agree with Hillary Clinton that we should not have vouchers?
Einstein said, “You cannot solve a problem with the same mind that created it.” Similarly, we won’t improve our country until we improve our level of public debate. On these pages I outline how we can automate conflict resolution and cost-benefit analysis and solve our problems at a level higher than how they were caused.
To start, we will break our problems down into their sub-components, including beliefs, supporting, and weakening evidence, and arguments. This will allow thousands or millions of us to evaluate each part of an argument and evidence one at a time. We will group beliefs by topic and sort them by their positivity, strength, and level of specificity. This will prevent duplication and allow us to focus on one issue at a time.
The Idea Stock Exchange (ISE) proposes a groundbreaking framework for tackling complex issues, resolving conflicts, and fostering informed decision-making. Here's a detailed breakdown of its key features:
Evidence-driven: Prioritizes verifiable data and logical reasoning, ensuring well-informed conclusions.
Dynamic Ranking System: Inspired by Google's PageRank, it evaluates arguments based on the strength of their evidence, dynamically adjusting as new information emerges.
2. Multi-faceted Evaluation Metrics:
Cost-Benefit Analysis: Assesses proposed solutions by examining potential costs, benefits, likelihoods, and impact.
Argumentative Strength Assessment: Categorizes arguments based on logical consistency, evidence, relevance, and significance.
Maslow's Hierarchy Integration: Aligns the evaluation with fundamental human needs for a broader perspective.
3. Sophisticated Scoring and Ranking Protocols:
Precision Scoring Formula: Combines argument scores with evidence assessments to determine argument validity.
Evidence-Based Ranking System: Leverages algorithms to rank solutions based on predicted costs and benefits, with dynamic updates based on new information.
4. Uniqueness and Redundancy Scores:
Equivalency Score: Identifies similar arguments using semantic similarity metrics and machine learning, coupled with community feedback, to reduce redundancy and develop unique scores.
"Better Ways of Saying the Same Thing": Helps users find alternative expressions of the same idea, enhancing clarity and reducing duplication.
5. Logical Fallacy and Argument Evaluation:
Fallacy Detection: Implements algorithms to identify and flag potentially fallacious arguments, promoting rational discourse.
User-Contributed Evidence Assessment: Allows the community to contribute evidence supporting or weakening arguments for collaborative verification.
6. Technological Integration and User Interaction:
Database Tools: Proposes building tools to map conclusions, assumptions, and their relationships for deeper understanding.
Interactive Interface: Users can actively participate by submitting evidence, voting on argument strength, and suggesting alternative viewpoints.
7. Promoting Quality Debate:
Separating Argument Types: Distinguishes between truth, importance, and relevance arguments for a more nuanced debate structure.
Encouraging Constructive Dialogue: Aims to shift focus from emotional responses to evidence-based reasoning, fostering meaningful discourse over sensationalism.
8. Community-Driven Evolution:
Open-Source Development: Encourages community involvement in refining and evolving the platform, ensuring its adaptability and relevance.
Additional Considerations:
Data Quality and Bias: Implementing robust measures to ensure data accuracy and mitigate potential biases in algorithms and user contributions.
Transparency and Explainability: Providing clear explanations of scoring methods and decision-making processes to build trust and understanding.
User Engagement and Education: Fostering active participation and educating users on the platform's functionalities and responsible use.
We are a political party that organizes all the ideas and arguments by subject, and lets them battle in a survival of the fittest death-match.
We are a political party that supports candidates that promises to make their decisions based on online cost benefit and idea evaluation algorithms. They just have to use a forum that ties the strength of their conclusion to the strength of their assumption, so that when you strengthen or weaken an assumption you also strengthen or weaken conclusions based on the assumption.
We have had the technological ability to create a world based on logic for too long. It is about time we build a rational political party based on the assumption that we support plans, conclusions, activities, and policies that can gather evidence based support, and that we don't do things that don't stand up to analysis.
We will conduct open, online, cost/benefit analysis of each issue. It is about time.
Welcome to the website for the best political party of all time, and the future of reason based decisions making.
"No concept you form is valid unless you integrate it without contradiction into the sum of human knowledge."
Comments (0)
You don't have permission to comment on this page.