Welcome to the Idea Stock Exchange Directory. Find your topic, identify your current stance on the spectrum, and click through to explore the best arguments, evidence, and underlying assumptions for every perspective.

• X (formerly Twitter) and the Digital Public Square
• −100% (Strict Moderation): Unregulated social media destroys democracy; X must be strictly held liable by governments for hate speech, algorithmic radicalization, and misinformation.
• +100% (Absolutist): X should only restrict speech that explicitly violates the law; any other top-down moderation is tyrannical censorship that suppresses truth-seeking.
• X Games, Extreme Sports, and the Regulation of Risk
• −100% (Restrictive/Paternalistic): Extreme sports glorify severe injury and death; media broadcasting them should be restricted to protect youth, and participants shouldn't burden public health systems.
• +100% (Total Autonomy): Pushing the limits of human physical capability is an essential freedom and an inspiring cultural good; the state and society have no right to mandate safety in personal pursuits.
• X-Prize and Prize-Driven Innovation
• −100% (Strongly Oppose): Prizes are publicity stunts that reward showmanship over durable systems; they divert public funds into spectacle and leave no sustainable follow‑through.
• +100% (Evangelical): Replace traditional R&D grants with a prize economy: market‑like signals produce vastly superior outcomes and accountability.
• X-Rated Material, Pornography, and Internet Censorship
• −100% (Prohibitionist): Pornography is a public health crisis that destroys relationships, exploits performers, and alters brain chemistry; it should be heavily criminalized.
• +100% (Absolutist): Consumption of adult material is a fundamental free expression right; government age-verification mandates are a Trojan horse for destroying online anonymity.
• Xenophobia and Immigration Policy
• −100% (Restrictive): Open borders are a security and cultural catastrophe; strict limits and aggressive deportation are the only responsible policies.
• +100% (Abolitionist Openness): Borders are morally arbitrary; people should possess the fundamental human right to move, live, and work anywhere on the globe.
• X‑Risk (Existential Risk) Prioritization
• −100% (Dismissive): Existential risk talk is an alarmist distraction pushed by tech elites to avoid dealing with immediate problems like poverty, inequality, and disease.
• +100% (Maximalist / Longtermist): Preventing human extinction is the single greatest moral imperative; we must redirect major portions of global GDP to x‑risk mitigation right now to protect trillions of unborn future lives.